Just out of curiosity, what do you mean with module config? Cheers Robbie
On Jul 18, 2:07 am, "Dhanji R. Prasanna" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey thanks for this list... > > Persist extension is wanting, It'll be another week at least before I can > give it the right attention. For servlet, we need to build some kind of > introspection API that's similar to injector's, but that can wait I suppose. > > If we can turn injector builder's options into some kind of module config > that would rule... > > Dhanji. > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Sam Berlin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here's another status update (in an effort to get 3.0 out soon) -- > > > Open issues: > > > * 366 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=366> - > > @Provides doesn't respect @Nullable > > Status: Patch attached [from me], needs review (it adds APIs). > > > * 436 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=436> - > > Provide access to Guice's own internal TypeConverters > > Status: Patch attached [from Stuart], needs review (it adds APIs, makes > > some classes public, and changes a bit of the internals). > > > * 508 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=508> - AOP > > visibility checks should include the method return type. > > Status: Patch attached [from Stuart], just waiting on some tests before > > applying. > > > * 509 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=509> - > > Cache result of Class.getAnnotations() > > Status: Perf improvement request, no patch attached. > > > * 510 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=510> - > > Remove InjectorBuilder > > Status: Rationale for keeping InjectorBuilder listed in the comments > > along with other possible scenarios, awaiting replies. > > > * 513 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=513> - Why > > do we need Injector.getAllBindings? > > Status: Rationale for why it's useful in the comments, awaiting replies. > > > * 514 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=514> - Do > > we need Injector.getExistingBinding()? > > Status: Rationale for why it's useful (but not strictly necessary) in > > the comments, awaiting replies. > > > * 515 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=515> - What > > are the use cases for @Toolable? > > Status: Use cases listed in the comments, awaiting replies. > > > * 516 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=516> - > > Investigate duplicate binding filtering > > Status: Performance implications & rationale explained in comments, > > awaiting replies. > > > * 517 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=517> - Fix > > classloader leak > > Status: More questions asked in the comments, awaiting answers. > > > * 518 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=518> - > > Hide Key.ofType() > > Status: Question opened, no replies. Awaiting comments. > > > * 519 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=519> - > > toProvider() should use Guice's Provider, not JSR-330 > > Status: Lots of discussion in comments, no resolution. > > > * Cleanup new guice-persist extension. > > Status: Some code review changes applied... is it stable? > > > * maven2 POM? > > Status: I don't know? > > > * Include guice-grapher extension in release > > Status: Open question, awaiting comments. > > > Closed issues: > > * Undeprecate Guice.createInjector. [DONE, > > r1180<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1180> > > ] > > * Fix servlet extension to allow multiple modules/filters/injectors in one > > JVM. [DONE, > > r1187<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1187> > > ] > > * Add "@since 3.0" to new APIs. [DONE, > > r1183<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1183> > > ] > > * Remove ScopeChecker [DONE, > > r1179<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1179> > > ] > > * Refactor internal package (move utility class to .internal.util) [DONE, > > r1185 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1185>] > > * Fix overridden @Inject method behavior [DONE, > > r1177<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1177> > > ] > > * JIT providers / autobinders [SHELVED] > > > sam > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "google-guice-dev" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
