Take a look at the comments in http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=510 , comment #1. I think it's option 1) and/or 5) listed there.
sam On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Robbie Vanbrabant < [email protected]> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what do you mean with module config? > > Cheers > Robbie > > On Jul 18, 2:07 am, "Dhanji R. Prasanna" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey thanks for this list... > > > > Persist extension is wanting, It'll be another week at least before I can > > give it the right attention. For servlet, we need to build some kind of > > introspection API that's similar to injector's, but that can wait I > suppose. > > > > If we can turn injector builder's options into some kind of module config > > that would rule... > > > > Dhanji. > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Sam Berlin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Here's another status update (in an effort to get 3.0 out soon) -- > > > > > Open issues: > > > > > * 366 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=366> - > > > @Provides doesn't respect @Nullable > > > Status: Patch attached [from me], needs review (it adds APIs). > > > > > * 436 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=436> - > > > Provide access to Guice's own internal TypeConverters > > > Status: Patch attached [from Stuart], needs review (it adds APIs, > makes > > > some classes public, and changes a bit of the internals). > > > > > * 508 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=508> - > AOP > > > visibility checks should include the method return type. > > > Status: Patch attached [from Stuart], just waiting on some tests > before > > > applying. > > > > > * 509 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=509> - > > > Cache result of Class.getAnnotations() > > > Status: Perf improvement request, no patch attached. > > > > > * 510 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=510> - > > > Remove InjectorBuilder > > > Status: Rationale for keeping InjectorBuilder listed in the comments > > > along with other possible scenarios, awaiting replies. > > > > > * 513 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=513> - > Why > > > do we need Injector.getAllBindings? > > > Status: Rationale for why it's useful in the comments, awaiting > replies. > > > > > * 514 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=514> - > Do > > > we need Injector.getExistingBinding()? > > > Status: Rationale for why it's useful (but not strictly necessary) > in > > > the comments, awaiting replies. > > > > > * 515 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=515> - > What > > > are the use cases for @Toolable? > > > Status: Use cases listed in the comments, awaiting replies. > > > > > * 516 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=516> - > > > Investigate duplicate binding filtering > > > Status: Performance implications & rationale explained in comments, > > > awaiting replies. > > > > > * 517 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=517> - > Fix > > > classloader leak > > > Status: More questions asked in the comments, awaiting answers. > > > > > * 518 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=518> - > > > Hide Key.ofType() > > > Status: Question opened, no replies. Awaiting comments. > > > > > * 519 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=519> - > > > toProvider() should use Guice's Provider, not JSR-330 > > > Status: Lots of discussion in comments, no resolution. > > > > > * Cleanup new guice-persist extension. > > > Status: Some code review changes applied... is it stable? > > > > > * maven2 POM? > > > Status: I don't know? > > > > > * Include guice-grapher extension in release > > > Status: Open question, awaiting comments. > > > > > Closed issues: > > > * Undeprecate Guice.createInjector. [DONE, r1180< > http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1180> > > > ] > > > * Fix servlet extension to allow multiple modules/filters/injectors in > one > > > JVM. [DONE, r1187< > http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1187> > > > ] > > > * Add "@since 3.0" to new APIs. [DONE, r1183< > http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1183> > > > ] > > > * Remove ScopeChecker [DONE, r1179< > http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1179> > > > ] > > > * Refactor internal package (move utility class to .internal.util) > [DONE, > > > r1185 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1185>] > > > * Fix overridden @Inject method behavior [DONE, r1177< > http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1177> > > > ] > > > * JIT providers / autobinders [SHELVED] > > > > > sam > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "google-guice-dev" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]> > <google-guice-dev%[email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]> > > > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
