I'm not sure what you mean by "please evaluate the proxies". Do you mean circular proxies, and you want to disable them? See InjectorBuilder.disableCircularProxies.
sam 2010/7/23 Endre Stølsvik <[email protected]> > Please evaluate the proxies - an option to turn that idea off is my > personal top priority for Guice. The construction of objects should be done > such that they aren't needed, or, if cycles exists, any setter/field > injection on any of the classes in question should resolve it. > > Endre. > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 01:56, Sam Berlin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Here's another status update (in an effort to get 3.0 out soon) -- >> >> Open issues: >> >> * 366 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=366> - >> @Provides doesn't respect @Nullable >> Status: Patch attached [from me], needs review (it adds APIs). >> >> * 436 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=436> - >> Provide access to Guice's own internal TypeConverters >> Status: Patch attached [from Stuart], needs review (it adds APIs, makes >> some classes public, and changes a bit of the internals). >> >> * 508 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=508> - AOP >> visibility checks should include the method return type. >> Status: Patch attached [from Stuart], just waiting on some tests before >> applying. >> >> * 509 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=509> - >> Cache result of Class.getAnnotations() >> Status: Perf improvement request, no patch attached. >> >> * 510 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=510> - >> Remove InjectorBuilder >> Status: Rationale for keeping InjectorBuilder listed in the comments >> along with other possible scenarios, awaiting replies. >> >> * 513 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=513> - Why >> do we need Injector.getAllBindings? >> Status: Rationale for why it's useful in the comments, awaiting >> replies. >> >> * 514 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=514> - Do >> we need Injector.getExistingBinding()? >> Status: Rationale for why it's useful (but not strictly necessary) in >> the comments, awaiting replies. >> >> * 515 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=515> - >> What are the use cases for @Toolable? >> Status: Use cases listed in the comments, awaiting replies. >> >> * 516 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=516> - >> Investigate duplicate binding filtering >> Status: Performance implications & rationale explained in comments, >> awaiting replies. >> >> * 517 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=517> - Fix >> classloader leak >> Status: More questions asked in the comments, awaiting answers. >> >> * 518 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=518> - >> Hide Key.ofType() >> Status: Question opened, no replies. Awaiting comments. >> >> * 519 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=519> - >> toProvider() should use Guice's Provider, not JSR-330 >> Status: Lots of discussion in comments, no resolution. >> >> * Cleanup new guice-persist extension. >> Status: Some code review changes applied... is it stable? >> >> * maven2 POM? >> Status: I don't know? >> >> * Include guice-grapher extension in release >> Status: Open question, awaiting comments. >> >> Closed issues: >> * Undeprecate Guice.createInjector. [DONE, >> r1180<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1180> >> ] >> * Fix servlet extension to allow multiple modules/filters/injectors in >> one JVM. [DONE, >> r1187<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1187> >> ] >> * Add "@since 3.0" to new APIs. [DONE, >> r1183<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1183> >> ] >> * Remove ScopeChecker [DONE, >> r1179<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1179> >> ] >> * Refactor internal package (move utility class to .internal.util) [DONE, >> r1185 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1185>] >> * Fix overridden @Inject method behavior [DONE, >> r1177<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1177> >> ] >> * JIT providers / autobinders [SHELVED] >> >> sam >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "google-guice-dev" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
