Thor, Mate you state some obvious rubbish.
Javascript always had more developers you imbecile. I have learnt 10 languages due to greedy companies. It shows that USA is a suck hole. Still 65% of mobile device dev work is trapped in USA due to greed. Whats happened is that you can't afford it due to GFC. To many air craft carriers and nuclear reactors. Keep dropping bombs you freak. If you do your research, front end top heavy code such as JS and AJAX are good for car company internal apps. FLASH looks better and is quicker to use. JS makes web maps seem cool but just adds more trash to invade privacy and destroy browser compatibility. Keep going back to MLP you fool. Indians did this with PHP and Java as it would have put half the world developers out of work overnight. OOP OOOP MVC my nob, what shit. In Australia we have a breed of lying business men that talk the talk but can't walk the walk. People here are lying to get IT jobs. What the hell are yanks doing? They are getting busted siphoning money into fake projects. USA have taught theft and lying to be normal. Overloading the users computer with front end crap that is no longer browser compatible is a security risk due to personal data theft which google are forcing. You can't track as much with FLASH can you boof head. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Thor Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: > I can assure you that in no way does this decision reflect an enmity for > Flash as a technology. It's simply a matter of making the most effective use > of the resources we have. Let's say it takes two full time engineers to > continue to develop the Maps API for Flash, and their work will benefit 100 > developers as you suggest. Or they could work on the JavaScript Maps API, > where their work will benefit 10,000 developers. In a year's time, the 100 > developers will have grown to say 150, but the JS developers will have grown > to 20,000. Once you accept this reality, the most effective way to utilise > those engineers (who are valuable and hard to find) is unarguably to put > them on the JS API. It really is that simple. > > I know it's tempting to speculate on broader strategic conspiracies, > especially when faced with a big and generally opaque company like Google. > That's your prerogative. However the facts of the matter are as simple as > the paragraph above. > > Many thanks, > > Thor. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Maps API For Flash" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-api-for-flash/-/-NSAl9AqgpoJ. > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api-for-flash?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API For Flash" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api-for-flash?hl=en.
