On Sep 3, 1:43 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Funnily enough, I will also be using the chart api in this app!
> Everywhere I look I find another use for another Google API (I'm
> hoping that I'll find more uses if I get to the developer day. I've
> registered, but not heard anything other than confirmation I have
> registered, has anyone else?)
>
> > I would like to be able to draw dynamic polys on static maps legally.
> > It can be done illegally using Google's "mld" server.  It uses the
> > same encoding scheme used by "formEncoded" polys applied to integer
> > pixels rather than floating point Lat/Lon coordinates.  The X & Y
> > elements are reversed.  A checksum of "9999" is added to the end.
>
> I have used your js stuff as a basis for generating complex polylines
> as images. It's .NET, but if you'd like the code I will tidy it up and
> post it. In my system it's connected to a database that stores
> boundaries as Lat/Lng points & generates the image based on the size &
> centre point, using your maths.
>
> I'm hoping Pamela's still here, but what I'd really like to do is
> generate the static image & draw the boundaries onto the gif (or png),
> cache the result and serve the edited file on my site. This would mean
> it loads much quicker and we're not hitting the google servers as
> often.
> As long as the google logo and trademark on the bottom aren't
> obsucred, would that be a problem, or must I have the boundary as a
> seperate image?
>
> Cheers
>
> Ben

What might be REALLY useful is a LEGAL clone of Google's "mld" image
server.  I have produced polys directly with Google's "mld" image
server but I doubt it is legal.  I will be happy to share what I have
learned about their encoding algorithm.

Yes, please post your code.  I may not be able to use it but someone
else could.  If enough auxilliary tools for static maps are developed,
Google may do something to trim the bloat from their dynamic maps.
Modularization is helpful but it does not significantly reduce the
infrastructure.  A 200KB gorilla is not appropriate for every
application.

I updated "adjust.js" a few days ago.  It now has inverse functions:

    LLToXY
    XYToLL

I agree with your desire to combine Google's map with your markers at
your server but it is unlikely to happen.  It is much more efficient
to send one file than several over a potentially slow link.  Combining
overlays in the browser impedes both panning & zooming.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to