On Sep 4, 7:29 pm, marcelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's a very nice lightweight solution, only that the polygons are a > bit rough.
If it requires the whole API to be loaded, I do not understand the point. A "light weight" solution is one without the full API. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
