On Apr 28, 6:24 am, Arech <[email protected]> wrote: > > I should think you're best-placed to try the different methods with > > your data! > > That is true, but I thought it is possible for one, who knows how > polylines and icons are handled by different browsers, to estimate > which approach is faster by knowing if it GPolyline or GIcon based. > > > However, I reckon that the number of polylines is the determining > > factor and "several hundreds" will be far too many for most browsers > > no matter how you are adding arrows. > > Well, take any reasonable big number you like. It doesn't matter if it > will be 100 or 10 or 1000. Just answer, which one will be faster and > why you think so? :)
Why don't you test it and get back to the group with your results? (test different browsers with the 2 different techniques) -- Larry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
