Hey Josh,
I don't really have any complaints about the new look, but when
running with slower internet speeds it takes forever to load while the
old one loaded a lot faster.
The other thing is, it doesn't really work. Like I mean yeah it'll
give me a word when i search for that one word, but if I put in a
phrase it doesn't give me the correct translation (I used to use
google translate to check my work and it doesn't quite give me the
same results) Also sometimes it doesn't account for the No, but if I
put in NO, then it works, but with a whole different meaning in
between the two entries. The whole translation is usually pretty off
too. Uses the wrong person as the subject and direct object and is
just a mess. I don't mind the look, but can you please revert back to
the old automation system. It worked really well.
Sorry if this was the wrong thread to post it on, this was the first
one I saw. I'd also like to take this time to thank you for trying to
make your system better and more effective. I prefer this system to
other translating systems because of it's speed and accuracy, but if
it's not fast or accurate anymore I may have to go back to the high
school days of freetranslation.com (which still isn't all that great,
but better than the new google translate)
Thanks a bunch, keep up the good work, and I hope the feedback helps!
Sincerely,
Ali
On Nov 20, 12:06 am, darkyndy wrote:
> I've done a greasemonkey script, you can find it
> athttp://userscripts.org/scripts/show/62436, it's not fully tested, it
> was just a one hour script, because initialy I've tried a more complex
> manner, but in the end I've made it only from CSS.
>
> Hope it helps. If someone finds bugs then post those in the Discussion
> section, for the user script.
>
> On Nov 19, 9:59 am, Mulla Krekar wrote:
>
> > I would love u untill end of life if u could make a greasmonkey script
> > and share with me so it would be easy to use the translator
