Because it's easy to bikeshed: can we make the -soyc (-soycExtra) flag more
like -style in that it has multiple values rather than having two separate
flags? Or is there a rationale for this style that I'm missing.
When Bob V's permutation control changes land, we want to make all of this
sort of stuff fall into the category of deferred binding properties, so that
you could, for example, create one permutaiton with style PRETTY, another
with style DETAILED, etc. Having the -soyc flag follow a name/value pattern
would make it more amenable to this change.

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 2009/07/16 22:28:18, Lex wrote:
>
>
> I think this is a great step forward.  This version of Soyc is much more
> intuitive, and will make it much easier to explain.  There are a couple
> of things that occurred to me, but otherwise it LGTM:
>
> 1. Is the detailed output truly a "more detailed version" of the version
> that uses JavaToJavaScriptMaps?  I think that because of inlining, etc.,
> and the resulting partial billing, you will end up with different
> cumulative sizes for fragments.  This is probably fine, but if I were
> using Soyc and wanted to get "more detailed information", and got
> different numbers, I would think that there is a bug.  How can we set
> expectations correctly?
>
> 2) I'm not the biggest fan of having two compiler flags, -soyc and
> -soycExtra, but if you are, then it's fine.
>
> A few small comments are in the code.
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/51804
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to