Sure!

2010/3/19 Ray Ryan <[email protected]>

> I think bikeshed/{src,test}/com/google/gwt/collections/client/ is just
> right.
>
> Be warned, btw, that we have no ant test target in the build.xml there yet.
> Patches welcome ;-)
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Rodrigo Chandia <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> You just told me right in time (talking to myself: how was incantation to
>> revert the last git commit?)
>>
>> Just to make sure. The classes should go into:
>>
>> bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/collections/client/
>> bikeshed/test/com/google/gwt/collections/client/
>>
>> Or would it be better to do a new project under bikeshed/collections?
>>
>> 2010/3/19 Ray Ryan <[email protected]>
>>
>> Great. When you move them to trunk/bikeshed, please *don't* put them
>>> under the com.google.gwt.bikeshed package. We've concluded that was a
>>> mistake and will be rejiggering it slightly. Your stuff should stay in its
>>> real packages.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Rodrigo Chandia <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes. I like your idea. I'll move the development to bikeshed so nobody
>>>> thinks this is ready for general consumption. Once the classes are in a
>>>> "good enough" state we will migrate (move) things into GWT proper.
>>>>
>>>> Afterwards, integration of these classes into GWT (aka "using them for
>>>> interesting things") will be done using a branch as some changes might be
>>>> somewhat intrusive.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rodrigo
>>>>
>>>> El 19 de marzo de 2010 11:51, Miguel Méndez <[email protected]>escribió:
>>>>
>>>> I'm not advocating that you save up for one large patch at the end.  You
>>>>> should have the code reviewed in increments as you are planning on doing.
>>>>>  All I'm suggesting is that the code not land in trunk/user/... until is
>>>>> ready.  A real branch or bikeshed would be a better place.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Rodrigo Chandia 
>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, discussion and comments are welcome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am developing all this in a branch. The idea is to keep reviewing
>>>>>> the changes until we are all satisfied with it. I just thought it made 
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> sense to publish small changes rather than posting a huge patch for 
>>>>>> review
>>>>>> at the end. I can do either or something in between, but I tend to lean
>>>>>> towards the incremental approach.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> El 18 de marzo de 2010 14:40, Miguel Méndez <[email protected]>escribió:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure if this has been discussed already, but you should consider
>>>>>>> developing these in a branch until the landing plan for the changes is
>>>>>>> clear.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:50 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reviewers: fabbott,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Description:
>>>>>>>> Array implementation for Lightweight Collections. Pure Java
>>>>>>>> implementation only.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is part of an incremental review. Not likely to land until
>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> parts are reviewed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/232801
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Affected files:
>>>>>>>>  A user/src/com/google/gwt/collections/Array.java
>>>>>>>>  A user/src/com/google/gwt/collections/Assertions.java
>>>>>>>>  A user/src/com/google/gwt/collections/CollectionFactory.java
>>>>>>>>  A user/src/com/google/gwt/collections/ConstantTime.java
>>>>>>>>  A user/src/com/google/gwt/collections/LinearTime.java
>>>>>>>>  A user/src/com/google/gwt/collections/MutableArray.java
>>>>>>>>  A user/test/com/google/gwt/collections/ObjectArrayTest.java
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Miguel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply
>>>>>> to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Miguel
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply
>>>>> to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to
>>>> this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to
>>> this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to
>> this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>>
>
>  --
> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to
> this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this 
email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.

Reply via email to