On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Bruce Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> re: package...consider skipping the "client" convention because it's > meant to be used on the server too. that new form of target-less > naming is part of the design experiment I hope this work can include. The convention in use elsewhere is that code intended to be used on both the client and server be in a "shared" package. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
