I guess we could use a supersource trick to swap in the JS-optimized ones 2010/3/19 John Tamplin <[email protected]>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Bruce Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> re: package...consider skipping the "client" convention because it's >> meant to be used on the server too. that new form of target-less >> naming is part of the design experiment I hope this work can include. > > > The convention in use elsewhere is that code intended to be used on both > the client and server be in a "shared" package. > > -- > John A. Tamplin > Software Engineer (GWT), Google > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to > this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject. > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
