yeah, CheckBox doesn't work out of the box either because it needs to implement ValueBase
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Patrick Julien <[email protected]> wrote: > thanks for the info > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sep 30, 6:56 pm, Patrick Julien <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Is there a class that integrates the two? same for check boxes? >> >> Hmm, CheckBox implements IsEditor<LeafValueEditor<Boolean>> so it >> should work OK for a boolean value. >> >> RadioButton extends CheckBox so it's a "boolean editor", but radio >> buttons are not about boolean things... :-/ >> >> I think for checkbox lists (multi-valued selection) and radio button >> lists (and even a Cell-widget-based selector), you'd (currently) have >> to make your own Editor<?> class. >> It seems hard to provide such editors out-of-the-box because there are >> many use cases, depending on whether you want the value be the "index" >> in a list of acceptable values, the "form value" of the checkbox/ >> radiobutton, or an object in a list of acceptable values (this is >> similar to why ListBox does not implement HasValue); not to mention >> how you'd like your checkboxes/radiobuttons be laid out! >> >> (Also noteworthy: SimpleCheckBox implements neither IsEditor or even >> HasValue; and for single selection within a dropdown list, there's >> ValueListBox) >> >> -- >> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
