On 2 oct, 01:17, Patrick Julien <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, now I know what you're saying, I was trying to wrap this thing in > a decorator, you just need to use it directly since it's an editor
AFAICT, the only thing you won't have is the display of validation errors (which ValueBoxEditorDecorator takes care of; in other words, ValueBoxEditorDecorator has no other use than adding this feature to any ValueBoxBase, by implementing both HasEditorErrors and IsEditor) -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
