Ah, now I know what you're saying, I was trying to wrap this thing in a decorator, you just need to use it directly since it's an editor
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Patrick Julien <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 1 oct, 18:14, Patrick Julien <[email protected]> wrote: >>> yeah, CheckBox doesn't work out of the box either because it needs to >>> implement ValueBase >> >> Because you try to wrap it in a ValueBoxEditorDecorator? > > Yep, I have, you need ValueBase in order to use a ValueBox > >> Judging from the code (i.e. I haven't tested to confirm what I'm >> saying here), CheckBox should work as a "simple" IsEditor (i.e. >> @UiField CheckBox myBooleanPropertyEditor) > > That works but the driver can't find this editor, so you don't get > binding from your backing type to the UI type > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
