On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2 oct, 01:17, Patrick Julien <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ah, now I know what you're saying, I was trying to wrap this thing in >> a decorator, you just need to use it directly since it's an editor > > AFAICT, the only thing you won't have is the display of validation > errors (which ValueBoxEditorDecorator takes care of; in other words, > ValueBoxEditorDecorator has no other use than adding this feature to > any ValueBoxBase, by implementing both HasEditorErrors and IsEditor)
True, but at the same time, it's a check box, validation shouldn't be an issue anyway -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
