making it a class instead of an interface means we can't mock it anymore. On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Ray Ryan <[email protected]> wrote: > We're making a few breaking changes in 2.1.1 to the new features introduced > in 2.1. (We're not supposed to do that kind of thing, but are hoping to get > away with it in this quick follow up release before there is much > adoption.) > I'd like to add a change to Activity to that list, in order to allow it to > evolve in later releases when breakage of any kind won't be an option: I'd > like to make Activity an abstract class instead of an interface, basically > rename AbstractActivity. > Any objections? > rjrjr > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
