On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:43:25 AM UTC+2, Brian Slesinsky wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Haberman > <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> nor do we want to divide up the open source build into that many jars. > > > > I dunno, I assumed we were headed towards 1 module == 1 jar, but would > defer to > > others/Thomas since he's been working on it. >
At least Ray has expressed his willingness that we go that far. Well, that's just an assumption - I don't really know what the plan > is. Maybe it's easier with Maven? > It requires (well, it doesn't strictly *require* it actually) moving files around (one subdir per JAR to be built, with its own src/main/java and src/test/java) but dependency management is much easier (similar to BUILD: you declare dependency on an artifact/JAR and "bam", you have it in your buildpath/classpath; and the build can trigger cascading rebuilds of dependent modules) -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
