Our largest projects aren't using Super Dev Mode yet for the same reason - not fast enough yet. But it varies; we have a lot of smaller teams that like it.
- Brian On Friday, August 9, 2013 1:56:13 AM UTC-7, Matic Petek wrote: > > > Ray got automatic recompile working in Super Dev Mode for a Google team > I would be nice to hear how this was done on such large projects as Google > has. I try with out application (170k LOC of client code / GWT-RPC, etc.) > and it took 2x-3x more time then DevMode. > > > On Thursday, August 8, 2013 11:04:04 PM UTC+2, Brian Slesinsky wrote: >> >> I haven't been sending out emails for our meetings. Let's catch up: >> >> August 7th: >> - John got a "hello world" app running using separate compilation. We >> talked a bit about how it might get pulled back into GWT. >> - Brian: Firefox architecture changes may break the Development Mode >> plugin by the end of the year. (The ContextStack service went away [1] and >> word is that they will be making more architectural changes [2]. This isn't >> the end of Development Mode because we still have Chrome, but we should get >> moving on Super Dev Mode. >> - On the bright side, Firefox 23 has support for Source Maps. Need to try >> it out. >> - Brian will try out IntelliJ's support for Super Dev Mode. Also need to >> figure out Eclipse. >> - Need to look into support for variable names in Super Dev Mode. Ray: >> perhaps fix up pretty mode to work better? We can rename variables less >> often. >> - Fixing up stack traces is a project. We should save the original >> JavaScript exception and make sure that gets printed to the JavaScript >> console. Brian will start a design doc. >> - Talked about internal use of mgwt for mobile apps. >> - Need to figure out benefits of GWT.create() changes proposed by >> contributors. Concerned that it will prevent compiler improvements. >> >> [1] https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/3933/ >> [2] >> http://bholley.wordpress.com/2012/05/04/at-long-last-compartment-per-global/ >> >> July 31: >> - Deadline for GWT.create() talks coming up. Talked about plans. >> - Brian: GWT.log() works in Super Dev Mode; working on GWT.debugger(), >> Firefox plugin release. >> - John and Ray talked about incremental compilation >> - Matthew: Gerritt working again. >> - Ray got automatic recompile working in Super Dev Mode for a Google team >> - Talked about Goktug's JsInterop proposal [3]. Ray: Elemental would be a >> lot simpler. >> - Would it work with Dev Mode? Not optimistic. >> - Talked about Web Components. >> >> [3] >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tir74SB-ZWrs-gQ8w-lOEV3oMY6u6lF2MmNivDEihZ4/edit >> >> July 24: >> - Talked about providing a benchmark to the v8 team to improve GWT >> performance. >> - Talked about JsInterop proposal. >> - Talked about code generation bug [4] >> - Gerrit server was messed up. >> >> [4] https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8284 >> >> July 17: >> - Talked about JSInterop. >> - Can GSS be separately compiled/changed without recompiling the whole >> app? Put this into the build-time improvement bucked. >> - Talked about GWT.create conference. >> - Roberto: fixed issues with field initialization; initial fragment may >> be smaller. >> - Mike Brock not at Red Hat; effect on steering committee? >> > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
