Our largest projects aren't using Super Dev Mode yet for the same reason - not fast enough yet. But it varies; we have a lot of smaller teams that like it.
- Brian On Friday, August 9, 2013 1:56:13 AM UTC-7, Matic Petek wrote: > > > Ray got automatic recompile working in Super Dev Mode for a Google team > I would be nice to hear how this was done on such large projects as Google > has. I try with out application (170k LOC of client code / GWT-RPC, etc.) > and it took 2x-3x more time then DevMode. > > > On Thursday, August 8, 2013 11:04:04 PM UTC+2, Brian Slesinsky wrote: >> >> I haven't been sending out emails for our meetings. Let's catch up: >> >> August 7th: >> - John got a "hello world" app running using separate compilation. We >> talked a bit about how it might get pulled back into GWT. >> - Brian: Firefox architecture changes may break the Development Mode >> plugin by the end of the year. (The ContextStack service went away [1] and >> word is that they will be making more architectural changes [2]. This isn't >> the end of Development Mode because we still have Chrome, but we should get >> moving on Super Dev Mode. >> - On the bright side, Firefox 23 has support for Source Maps. Need to try >> it out. >> - Brian will try out IntelliJ's support for Super Dev Mode. Also need to >> figure out Eclipse. >> - Need to look into support for variable names in Super Dev Mode. Ray: >> perhaps fix up pretty mode to work better? We can rename variables less >> often. >> - Fixing up stack traces is a project. We should save the original >> JavaScript exception and make sure that gets printed to the JavaScript >> console. Brian will start a design doc. >> - Talked about internal use of mgwt for mobile apps. >> - Need to figure out benefits of GWT.create() changes proposed by >> contributors. Concerned that it will prevent compiler improvements. >> >> [1] https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/3933/ >> [2] >> http://bholley.wordpress.com/2012/05/04/at-long-last-compartment-per-global/ >> >> July 31: >> - Deadline for GWT.create() talks coming up. Talked about plans. >> - Brian: GWT.log() works in Super Dev Mode; working on GWT.debugger(), >> Firefox plugin release. >> - John and Ray talked about incremental compilation >> - Matthew: Gerritt working again. >> - Ray got automatic recompile working in Super Dev Mode for a Google team >> - Talked about Goktug's JsInterop proposal [3]. Ray: Elemental would be a >> lot simpler. >> - Would it work with Dev Mode? Not optimistic. >> - Talked about Web Components. >> >> [3] >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tir74SB-ZWrs-gQ8w-lOEV3oMY6u6lF2MmNivDEihZ4/edit >> >> July 24: >> - Talked about providing a benchmark to the v8 team to improve GWT >> performance. >> - Talked about JsInterop proposal. >> - Talked about code generation bug [4] >> - Gerrit server was messed up. >> >> [4] https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8284 >> >> July 17: >> - Talked about JSInterop. >> - Can GSS be separately compiled/changed without recompiling the whole >> app? Put this into the build-time improvement bucked. >> - Talked about GWT.create conference. >> - Roberto: fixed issues with field initialization; initial fragment may >> be smaller. >> - Mike Brock not at Red Hat; effect on steering committee? >> > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
