I'll do that tomorrow morning
On May 21, 2014 7:11 PM, "Manuel Carrasco Moñino" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Julien, it seems sourcemap has not been uploaded, Brian uses them.
>
> - Manolo
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Julien Dramaix <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the good job Manolo ! The mobile version of the site is really
>> better now.
>>
>> I've deployed the new version in production : http://www.gwtproject.org/
>>
>> Julien
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> All your suggestions are done and committed to gerrit.
>>>
>>> Demo instance has been updated with those changes:
>>> http://gwtproject.gquery.org
>>>
>>> - Manolo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:23 PM, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> SGTM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Julien Dramaix <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  >>> Others:
>>>>> >>>  - Clicking images shows blank page - perhaps just a deployment
>>>>> issue
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Don't see this issue, what images do you mean?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Click devmode screenshot in
>>>>> http://gwtproject.gquery.org/gettingstarted.html
>>>>>
>>>>> This issue already exists in the production website. I created a bug
>>>>> to track it and I propose to fix it later in another patch :
>>>>> https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8707
>>>>>
>>>>> > So I think we should either keep the old behavior (i.e.
>>>>> auto-collapse) or move the new behavior (no content association for ALL
>>>>> parent menus, expand and collapse on click,  NO auto-collapse).
>>>>> > Again the second option is ideal from my point of view but we may
>>>>> want to do it later for reducing the amount work.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm more in favor of the second option also.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > I know this is not a regression - as I noted earlier, all of my
>>>>> comments on the second part are already existing problems. The code
>>>>> examples was broken when we moved to gwtproject.org.
>>>>> > - We don't have syntax highlighting for example code (you can see
>>>>> that in the pages that you have linked)
>>>>> > - Content is not formatted at all in some sample codes (see
>>>>> http://gwtproject.gquery.org/doc/latest/tutorial/JUnit.html#write) -
>>>>> I guess I only saw a few of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> > We can defer all these stuff, just pointed in case if they are easy
>>>>> to fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed we should defer these stuff. During the gwt-meetup, I would
>>>>> like to propose and discuss of a possible revamp of the website. During
>>>>> this revamp, we could fixe all these problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose that Manolo (thanks again for the good job) fixes the
>>>>> behavior of the menu according to the Goktug second option and then merge
>>>>> his patches in order that we can deploy this version in production. This
>>>>> version improves a lot the existing web site and I would like to add a
>>>>> search box (using google custom search) asap.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julien
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:54 PM, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT
>>>>> Contributors <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 2:33 AM, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT
>>>>>>> Contributors <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pretty cool. Thanks for all the work. Also special kudos for fixing
>>>>>>>> the styling for download page, it is much more elegant now!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Footer:
>>>>>>>>  - We are now missing the extra space in the bottom of the pages
>>>>>>>> (the one before the footer)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  - The area for the footer is larger and the text is closer to the
>>>>>>>> bottom - I think the original spacing was better. Also if you take a 
>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>> at the overview page you will see the footer hides part of the image.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fixed css
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Others:
>>>>>>>>  - Clicking images shows blank page - perhaps just a deployment
>>>>>>>> issue
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't see this issue, what images do you mean?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Click devmode screenshot in
>>>>>> http://gwtproject.gquery.org/gettingstarted.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   - There is a broken "Advanced Topics" menu item - I think it is
>>>>>>>> mixed up with the Logging menu item.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixed, the logging item was indented wrong
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   - I would put "Optimize" to Advanced topics. Perhaps security
>>>>>>>> and i18n as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Done, I think i18n could be out. But anyway is difficult to put the
>>>>>>> edge about what are or not advanced topics
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  - Perhaps move Community -> Developer Spotlight under Resources?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  - In Resources, we can move gwt surveys to the end of the list
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Below are other issues that doesn't look like regressions. Perhaps
>>>>>>>> we can have some other quick wins before publishing the final version?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Menu:
>>>>>>>>  - Ideally the arrows shouldn't indent the menu items and instead
>>>>>>>> menu items should be aligned by text (e.g. gmail). I'm not sure if you 
>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> reusing any widgets here; if you aren't reusing we might want to change
>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> done. We dont use any widget, just html+css. gquery enhances the
>>>>>>> list adding handlers using selectors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  - We might want to change how menus behave. I actually like GWT
>>>>>>>> Developer pages (e.g.
>>>>>>>> https://developers.google.com/appengine/pricing) where menu items
>>>>>>>> that are parents of the other menu items are not used as links to a
>>>>>>>> content, instead they serve as a placeholder and collapses/expands 
>>>>>>>> based
>>>>>>>> when clicked. Also it won't auto collapse existing items. I think all
>>>>>>>> together that is more useable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have changed parents with not content (href = #)  to
>>>>>>> expand/collapse menu (See 'Advance topics' in docs).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having parent-items with content makes the menu shorter and easy to
>>>>>>> use, like 'side bars' in google code wikis
>>>>>>> https://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/WikiSyntax#Side_navigation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd rather auto-collapse on, but I have set it off as you prefer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if you look at the menu in that wiki page, you will see that
>>>>>> parent menu items are not acting as links to their own content instead 
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> are just placeholders for grouping and  will collapse/expand on click. I
>>>>>> think that is the most intuitive and what we should do in the long run,
>>>>>> however that might require some work to move the content to child pages.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nevertheless I think the last version is problematic:
>>>>>>  - Having menu item sometimes collapse sometimes not collapse when
>>>>>> clicked is not user friendly as they will behave inconsistently.
>>>>>>  - As it is difficult and not easy to discover how to collapse a menu
>>>>>> with content after it is expanded, it can become annoying for users to 
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> have auto-collapse enabled on navigation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I think we should either keep the old behavior (i.e.
>>>>>> auto-collapse) or move the new behavior (no content association for ALL
>>>>>> parent menus, expand and collapse on click,  NO auto-collapse).
>>>>>> Again the second option is ideal from my point of view but we may
>>>>>> want to do it later for reducing the amount work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> General:
>>>>>>>>  - We have smaller size font for links (probably regular text font
>>>>>>>> is larger than it suppose to be).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  - Looks like you made the body wider which I think is good but
>>>>>>>> making the whole page right aligned (i.e. all extra space goes to 
>>>>>>>> left) is
>>>>>>>> not a good idea. It looks really bad in widescreen (which many 
>>>>>>>> developers
>>>>>>>> has). We should probably follow a different approach for distributing 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> space (e.g. add the extra space to left until a max value is reached).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I dont know if I understand correctly. The width is adjusted based
>>>>>>> on media sizes, and I have set 3 sizes: wide desktop, small desktop &
>>>>>>> tablets and mobile. Also I have changed the font size (16 -> 14px) so as
>>>>>>> there is more text in the same place, and text alignment (left -> 
>>>>>>> justify).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have adjusted content padding for big desktop, I see correctly the
>>>>>>> pages, let me know if that works for you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LGTM. It looks like it distributes the spacing evenly for left and
>>>>>> right sight. I would use less padding before the leftnav but this is 
>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>> ok.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure if this is a new problem or not but now when you switch
>>>>>> through menu items, left nav sometimes jumps around. It looks this is
>>>>>> related to scrollbar being shown on the right or not. Perhaps you can use
>>>>>> the scrollbar only for the content bar to prevent that from happening.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   - All code samples lost formatting and even some lost line
>>>>>>>> wrapping after site migration.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Code styling has not changed for code blocks, I see these pages
>>>>>>> (current site, demo site) in the same way, maybe there is some other 
>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>> wrong or some style interfering
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsClient.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://gwtproject.gquery.org/v2/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsClient.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you check if you see them in the same way? or send me a link or
>>>>>>> screenshot of the page which works wrong?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know this is not a regression - as I noted earlier, all of my
>>>>>> comments on the second part are already existing problems. The code
>>>>>> examples was broken when we moved to gwtproject.org.
>>>>>>  - We don't have syntax highlighting for example code (you can see
>>>>>> that in the pages that you have linked)
>>>>>>  - Content is not formatted at all in some sample codes (see
>>>>>> http://gwtproject.gquery.org/doc/latest/tutorial/JUnit.html#write) -
>>>>>> I guess I only saw a few of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can defer all these stuff, just pointed in case if they are easy
>>>>>> to fix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can test new changes at http://gwtproject.gquery.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Manolo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to
>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>  To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAM28XAsipeC_DX-bjA9hstM%2B03QBkd6x6SeztgwOtPswX7xdkw%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAM28XAsipeC_DX-bjA9hstM%2B03QBkd6x6SeztgwOtPswX7xdkw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>  To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3qEr%2BQ_DziyHmUASTDk7%3Da4oE%3D02W0cphWYLAVB%3DDjVA%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3qEr%2BQ_DziyHmUASTDk7%3Da4oE%3D02W0cphWYLAVB%3DDjVA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>  To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D70o8oK3Yw0EYrW4Z2f0BTaxALi5ffnefH4aYh2wQ9vMQ%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D70o8oK3Yw0EYrW4Z2f0BTaxALi5ffnefH4aYh2wQ9vMQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>>  To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3_QC2iaMhGRA-ROZg8VKrsbhB16-K%3DzjBZnh8oO6hjwg%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3_QC2iaMhGRA-ROZg8VKrsbhB16-K%3DzjBZnh8oO6hjwg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected]
>>> .
>>>  To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAM28XAuvyFEX%3Du59JJd_6w_Cus8iSjmmcaTmu17NGheqWDF1VA%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAM28XAuvyFEX%3Du59JJd_6w_Cus8iSjmmcaTmu17NGheqWDF1VA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "GWT Contributors" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>>  To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D5_1_2BwMP54HP47cK-Jg%2BpKaWXfiZ7UWDV2GMgxV0XFg%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D5_1_2BwMP54HP47cK-Jg%2BpKaWXfiZ7UWDV2GMgxV0XFg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Contributors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAM28XAstGsLf_hqji2tN4XvqK6WTHeksKJdizL2gmyrHTGXvEg%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAM28XAstGsLf_hqji2tN4XvqK6WTHeksKJdizL2gmyrHTGXvEg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6Bqqt%2BXwa%3Do9Lop7gb9D40nasVSK35q27j5PHcaUh_pw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to