Ok so gwt 2.7 is going to provide pushstate functionality so we don't need the 3rd party libraries?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jens <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Thomas, >> >> Please can you link to the discussion where you decided it was ok to >> break compatibility with deferred binding implementations of the >> HistoryImpl. >> > > See comments in https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/6403/ > > -- J. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/b2d70738-bb2d-4eed-a6ea-8b5da5f08a78%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/b2d70738-bb2d-4eed-a6ea-8b5da5f08a78%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAEqaEVj_mNkvgqVmvp3SMeNjRH9mg%2BGq_%3DABtLiDSS93w3maTg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
