We also have choosen and stuck with gwt for the same reason. Productivity 
is really important. We come across angular but it still is not the same.* 
===* really :-)

I am an experienced gwt developer with 12+ years :-). Has is been that 
long. Must be, my youngest was just born when we launched our daycare 
product written in gwt. 

And located in the Netherland. But not looking for a Job. :-( 

But I will send your link to some people I know.  

Happy to help you along.

Marteijn

Op zondag 20 december 2020 om 16:15:55 UTC+1 schreef Alexander Bertram:

>
> Dear all, 
>
> I hope this email isn't too off-topic, but I wanted to share an opening 
> for a job on our team with a large GWT component.
>
> https://jobs.bedatadriven.com/software-engineer
>
> The first version of our product, ActivityInfo, a data collection and 
> analysis platform for humanitarian relief, was built with GWT, GXT and 
> Google Gears in 2009 and seriously would not have been possible without 
> GWT. 
>
> In 2018, nearly 10 years later, we looked at the amazing js ecosystem and 
> considered moving to Typescript or Elm.
>
> Instead, we decided to keep the bits that we loved about GWT: the 
> typesafety, code-reuse with the server, i18n, code splitting, linkers, and 
> the amazing compiler, and add SCSS for styles and our own port of Preact + 
> rxJava-like reactivity for dom manipulation using Elemental2. 
>
> Three years after the start of ActivityInfo 4.0 we couldn't be happier 
> with the choice, and are more productive than ever. 
>
> If you're an experienced GWT developer that would enjoy the challenge of a 
> working on a modern GWT codebase, I hope you'll consider joining our team!
>
>
> Best,
> Alex
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/735f8a2b-80f2-4770-8831-6a6138af0582n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to