Why did you bet on GWT 10 years ago and wouldn't bet on TypeScript nowadays? (fwiw, TypeScript is already 8 years old; Vue.js is 6 years old, React is 7)
On Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 5:26:38 PM UTC+1 lofid...@gmail.com wrote: > @swas... > > <quote> > Yes, almost 10 years for me too and production application running for 3 > years. > GWT 2.6.1 + Eclipse 4.8. Tomcat8 + MySQL5.7 + Java8 + JasperReport > my next 10 years plan is move to TypeScript + VueJS. > </quote> > > After 10 years, will we still be able to see TypeScript + VueJS? 😂 > > Cheers, > Lofi > RobW schrieb am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2021 um 15:29:42 UTC+1: > >> Our web front end is on 15 years with GWT as of this year, and we're >> expecting 5 more with luck. So we'll hit the 20 year mark if all goes well >> >> On Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 10:46:44 UTC aka...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> I wonder if that will actually last for the next 10 years. >>> >>> On Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 10:04:19 AM UTC+2 swas...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, almost 10 years for me too and production application running for >>>> 3 years. >>>> GWT 2.6.1 + Eclipse 4.8. Tomcat8 + MySQL5.7 + Java8 + JasperReport >>>> my next 10 years plan is move to TypeScript + VueJS. >>>> On Monday, 4 January 2021 at 23:37:53 UTC+7 Alexander Bertram wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nice to hear from everyone! >>>>> >>>>> Here's to the next ten years :-) >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes for 2021, >>>>> Alex >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 at 10:22:08 AM UTC+1 Segun Razaq Sobulo >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I've been using GWT for 7+ years (with appengine java backends) and >>>>>> actively looking for a job. I'll push my resume. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> On Monday, 21 December 2020 at 15:24:19 UTC+1 aka...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We are in times where working remotly id actually a good option. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, December 21, 2020 at 4:19:13 PM UTC+2 David Nouls wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Same story here. I have been working with GWT since it first came >>>>>>>> out. For our current project we again opted for GWT because we share a >>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>> of code between client and server and productivity is high. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I’m not available at the moment (maybe end of next year)… but >>>>>>>> living in Belgium/Leuven I don’t think that is doable. Relocation is >>>>>>>> not an >>>>>>>> option. Good luck finding people, there are not a lot on the market. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Groeten, >>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>> On 20 Dec 2020, 16:16 +0100, 'Alexander Bertram' via GWT Users < >>>>>>>> google-we...@googlegroups.com>, wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I hope this email isn't too off-topic, but I wanted to share an >>>>>>>> opening for a job on our team with a large GWT component. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://jobs.bedatadriven.com/software-engineer >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The first version of our product, ActivityInfo, a data collection >>>>>>>> and analysis platform for humanitarian relief, was built with GWT, GXT >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> Google Gears in 2009 and seriously would not have been possible >>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>> GWT. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In 2018, nearly 10 years later, we looked at the amazing js >>>>>>>> ecosystem and considered moving to Typescript or Elm. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Instead, we decided to keep the bits that we loved about GWT: the >>>>>>>> typesafety, code-reuse with the server, i18n, code splitting, linkers, >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> the amazing compiler, and add SCSS for styles and our own port of >>>>>>>> Preact + >>>>>>>> rxJava-like reactivity for dom manipulation using Elemental2. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Three years after the start of ActivityInfo 4.0 we couldn't be >>>>>>>> happier with the choice, and are more productive than ever. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you're an experienced GWT developer that would enjoy the >>>>>>>> challenge of a working on a modern GWT codebase, I hope you'll >>>>>>>> consider >>>>>>>> joining our team! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "GWT Users" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/46240bd9-f716-4448-a481-acfc87229f8fn%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/46240bd9-f716-4448-a481-acfc87229f8fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/014c15b5-a55e-4682-878d-910ea68e92e2n%40googlegroups.com.
