Yes, almost 10 years for me too and production application  running for 3 
years.
GWT 2.6.1 + Eclipse 4.8.  Tomcat8 + MySQL5.7  + Java8 + JasperReport
my next 10 years plan is  move to TypeScript + VueJS.
On Monday, 4 January 2021 at 23:37:53 UTC+7 Alexander Bertram wrote:

> Nice to hear from everyone!
>
> Here's to the next ten years :-)
>
> Best wishes for 2021,
> Alex
>
> On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 at 10:22:08 AM UTC+1 Segun Razaq Sobulo 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I've been using GWT for 7+ years (with appengine java backends) and 
>> actively looking for a job. I'll push my resume.
>>
>> Thanks
>> On Monday, 21 December 2020 at 15:24:19 UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> We are in times where working remotly id actually a good option.
>>>
>>> On Monday, December 21, 2020 at 4:19:13 PM UTC+2 David Nouls wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>
>>>> Same story here. I have been working with GWT since it first came out. 
>>>> For our current project we again opted for GWT because we share a lot of 
>>>> code between client and server and productivity is high.
>>>>
>>>> I’m not available at the moment (maybe end of next year)… but living in 
>>>> Belgium/Leuven I don’t think that is doable. Relocation is not an option. 
>>>> Good luck finding people, there are not a lot on the market.
>>>>
>>>> Groeten,
>>>> David
>>>> On 20 Dec 2020, 16:16 +0100, 'Alexander Bertram' via GWT Users <
>>>> [email protected]>, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,  
>>>>
>>>> I hope this email isn't too off-topic, but I wanted to share an opening 
>>>> for a job on our team with a large GWT component.
>>>>
>>>> https://jobs.bedatadriven.com/software-engineer
>>>>
>>>> The first version of our product, ActivityInfo, a data collection and 
>>>> analysis platform for humanitarian relief, was built with GWT, GXT and 
>>>> Google Gears in 2009 and seriously would not have been possible without 
>>>> GWT. 
>>>>
>>>> In 2018, nearly 10 years later, we looked at the amazing js ecosystem 
>>>> and considered moving to Typescript or Elm.
>>>>
>>>> Instead, we decided to keep the bits that we loved about GWT: the 
>>>> typesafety, code-reuse with the server, i18n, code splitting, linkers, and 
>>>> the amazing compiler, and add SCSS for styles and our own port of Preact + 
>>>> rxJava-like reactivity for dom manipulation using Elemental2.
>>>>
>>>> Three years after the start of ActivityInfo 4.0 we couldn't be happier 
>>>> with the choice, and are more productive than ever. 
>>>>
>>>> If you're an experienced GWT developer that would enjoy the challenge 
>>>> of a working on a modern GWT codebase, I hope you'll consider joining our 
>>>> team!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "GWT Users" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/46240bd9-f716-4448-a481-acfc87229f8fn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/46240bd9-f716-4448-a481-acfc87229f8fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/9597d6c9-33e5-47be-9fbb-e0225a3c6b00n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to