I wonder if that will actually last for the next 10 years.

On Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 10:04:19 AM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:

> Yes, almost 10 years for me too and production application  running for 3 
> years.
> GWT 2.6.1 + Eclipse 4.8.  Tomcat8 + MySQL5.7  + Java8 + JasperReport
> my next 10 years plan is  move to TypeScript + VueJS.
> On Monday, 4 January 2021 at 23:37:53 UTC+7 Alexander Bertram wrote:
>
>> Nice to hear from everyone!
>>
>> Here's to the next ten years :-)
>>
>> Best wishes for 2021,
>> Alex
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 at 10:22:08 AM UTC+1 Segun Razaq Sobulo 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I've been using GWT for 7+ years (with appengine java backends) and 
>>> actively looking for a job. I'll push my resume.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> On Monday, 21 December 2020 at 15:24:19 UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>> We are in times where working remotly id actually a good option.
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, December 21, 2020 at 4:19:13 PM UTC+2 David Nouls wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>
>>>>> Same story here. I have been working with GWT since it first came out. 
>>>>> For our current project we again opted for GWT because we share a lot of 
>>>>> code between client and server and productivity is high.
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m not available at the moment (maybe end of next year)… but living 
>>>>> in Belgium/Leuven I don’t think that is doable. Relocation is not an 
>>>>> option. Good luck finding people, there are not a lot on the market.
>>>>>
>>>>> Groeten,
>>>>> David
>>>>> On 20 Dec 2020, 16:16 +0100, 'Alexander Bertram' via GWT Users <
>>>>> [email protected]>, wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,  
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope this email isn't too off-topic, but I wanted to share an 
>>>>> opening for a job on our team with a large GWT component.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://jobs.bedatadriven.com/software-engineer
>>>>>
>>>>> The first version of our product, ActivityInfo, a data collection and 
>>>>> analysis platform for humanitarian relief, was built with GWT, GXT and 
>>>>> Google Gears in 2009 and seriously would not have been possible without 
>>>>> GWT. 
>>>>>
>>>>> In 2018, nearly 10 years later, we looked at the amazing js ecosystem 
>>>>> and considered moving to Typescript or Elm.
>>>>>
>>>>> Instead, we decided to keep the bits that we loved about GWT: the 
>>>>> typesafety, code-reuse with the server, i18n, code splitting, linkers, 
>>>>> and 
>>>>> the amazing compiler, and add SCSS for styles and our own port of Preact 
>>>>> + 
>>>>> rxJava-like reactivity for dom manipulation using Elemental2.
>>>>>
>>>>> Three years after the start of ActivityInfo 4.0 we couldn't be happier 
>>>>> with the choice, and are more productive than ever. 
>>>>>
>>>>> If you're an experienced GWT developer that would enjoy the challenge 
>>>>> of a working on a modern GWT codebase, I hope you'll consider joining our 
>>>>> team!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "GWT Users" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/46240bd9-f716-4448-a481-acfc87229f8fn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/46240bd9-f716-4448-a481-acfc87229f8fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/bb42927e-d36c-4ef2-8beb-5f1f424987bcn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to