-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 That may be true, but the perceptual damage is done. I never bothered to keep up with Applet developments because the user experience was so bad for so long. (10+ years? I'm pretty sure I saw my first applet in 1995, but I don't know if it was running in a browser.)
So does the JVM plugin start up as fast as Flash now? If so, that's great. D Peters wrote: > For the record -- a significant amount of the common applet > performance gripes were cleared up in 6u10. I'm suprised that so many > java developers know nothing about this release. This was a milestone > for JavaFX to move forward -- since it was built on top of a lot of > these improvements. If you don't mind JavaFX in the browser (it > doesnt have to run as JNLP, by the way)-- then you probably won't mind > using an applet -- because it is essentially running as an applet. As > more people develop JavaFX applications, and it becomes more > widespread, you will have a broader base of users who can also use > applets. > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJ0nnnrZoE3ArapxERCEXgAJ92wRZF3eFht2GJCgSgRuEWFxCuGACgrRBr jfDfHe8ibw3yQnkcEy+NP/A= =g5Pl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
