I Highly recommend SmartGWT, been using it for months now. Sanjiv and the smart client team have done a great job. Kudos!
The architecture is clever and robust , way better then Ext. Shay On Aug 13, 9:03 pm, Sanjiv Jivan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Daniel,Please try upgrading to SmartGWT 1.2. Hosted mode should perform > better. You're right that most of the resources from a compile output are > not used and so if you're benchmarking, best to actually see what's > transferred over the wire rather than the size of the output directory on > the server. The default com.smartgwt.SmartGwt module bundles all the > readable source versions that have a lot of documentation, the obfuscated / > minified ones, various tools like the Developer Console and a lot of other > resources that are pretty much never used in deployment. I'll look into > creating a module that outputs the minimal resources which will save some MB > of disk space on the server. > > As for runtime performance, you can have a look at the SmartGWT showcase > which is comparable is size to a real world application having ~260 samples > and includes most widget types. If you're not using Calendar, or TileGrid > etc you can exclude these resources. > > Sanjiv > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Daniel Jue <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is slow in hosted, although I'm on SmartGWT 1.1/GWT 1.7 at the moment. > > Deployed it is better, but its' still chunky. However it's full of features > > that I don't have the time or desire to recreate, so it works for me. It's > > definitely not a lightweight, but it's not bad. There's just a lot going on > > behind the scenes. The full "sc" directory that gets put in the war is like > > 18.7 MB (19,630,389 bytes) worth of Js files. I'm guessing 98% of those > > won't be touched/loaded. I like SmartGWT so far and have recommended it to > > some people. > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> It is slow in hosted? But how is it deployed in > >> a regular browser? > > >> On Aug 13, 4:00 pm, Daniel Jue <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I am using it. Once I got the extra layers of code implemented for the > >> RPC > >> > Datasource (mostly from off thier forum), It's been pretty painless. I > >> came > >> > from GXT 2 because I was having some rendering problems and wanted to > >> try > >> > something else. SmartGWT _is_ painfully slow in hosted mode, but the > >> > widgets are very nice and full featured. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
