first i thought it is hard to decide which front end/ widget framework to use (i decided to use pure gwt because of flexibility) but now after writing first small prototypes and reading about "best practices" and MVP, i came to conclusion that the much harder decision is how to implement MVP or how the backbone of my app would/should look like. Currently i implemented my like this "Large scale application development and MVP"<http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/webtoolkit/articles/mvp-architecture.html>and had problems to get the view humble enough (gwt discussion<https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/3wqCUQpz2d4/discussion>). But digging deeper led to MvpActivitiesAndPlaces<http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideMvpActivitiesAndPlaces.html>(at first sight this isn't "pure" MVP anymore?! it feels like a contradiction to MVP wit humble views?!) but i dug even deeper and found GWTP <http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/> and Errai<http://www.jboss.org/errai>. I also found articles about dependency injection and Gin/Guice and that this should be a part of a "good" Gwt-App (google-web-toolkit-gwt-mvp-example<http://blog.hivedevelopment.co.uk/2009/08/google-web-toolkit-gwt-mvp-example.html>). are frameworks that include dependeny injection preferable? So how to construct the backbone of my app? how comparable (or probably "combineable") are this 3 "frameworks". Is "Large scale application development and MVP"<http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/webtoolkit/articles/mvp-architecture.html>out of date?
(the application i am about to construct is a large scale (at least the budget is large) -public - statistical data - presenting - web-application) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
