Well, I was not asking for a proof, but thanks anyway :) I know it is possible to do that, the Expenses sample works that way... I was just wondering why you were saying that Activity´s don´t have anything to do with MVP, cause they are the backbone of my MVP implementations (they are the Presenter´s). But now I see the point, you can use Activity´s without "architecting" your app in the MVP way. You could have, for example, in the Activity a Presenter object (the implementation), the view object, and just set the the presenter object as the presenter in the View. It´s just that it does not make sense to me having an MVP designed app without using the Activity´s as Presenter´s. If someone has any reason to use another object (not the Activity) as the Presenter to make an MVP app, please tell me why.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
