Thx to all of you, confusion is disappearing (slowly) :-)
So the bottom line is: a good practice would be to use MVP ("part2" -Way) in
conjunction with "places and activities"(mainly for history management -
ignoring history management of "part1" - but also as a more abstract kind of
presenter(activity part)) ?
Is it possible (or probably preferable) to "aid" the implementation of MVP
by a MVP-Framework (like those mentioned above)? or would this raise some
conflicts with gwt's places and ativities?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
