Le vendredi 1 juillet 2011 18:12:45 UTC+2, cri a écrit : > > First, someone definitely *thought initially* that Views/ClientFactory/ > Activities/Places/PlaceHistoryMapper/ActivityMapper described on the > GWT *MVP* documentation page constituted a framework that could be > *used* at least for MVP. And, indeed, it can be. > > Secondly, to me and some others I'd guess, it seems superior in terms > of effort required than what is described in the "Part I and II" > articles. We have a number of people here that have used both and > there is agreement on this. However, I'm sure there are some relevant > pros and cons. >
That's because all of them talk about history management, not only MVP. The *MVP* part is only the View/Display interface and the handlers vs. the Presenter/Delegate interface (people use different names for similar those things); everything else is not part of the MVP *pattern*. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/j5fCwn2s-UEJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
