Thanks for the suggestions. Let me answer them piecewise. 1) As you know, Brendan resigned and declined the offers to remain at Mozilla in another leadership position, so there isn't much we can do about that. However, yes, it would be good if Brendan wrote a blog post with a full explanation.
2) We have lost one co-founder who was critical to the project. We are not going to lose another one, especially if the only criticism is on her blogging skills. 3) I'm not sure where that comes from. As you see it, how exactly have we not adopted openness? Best regards, David On 14/04/14 20:23, [email protected] wrote: > But, many have heard these arguments before. How can Mozilla get out of this? > 1) Hire Brendan back. If that's not possible, convince Brendan to give a full > explanation of why he left and the events as he saw it leading to his > decision. Bonus if he state honestly (without pressure) his thoughts and > feelings on Mozilla and its projects. > 2) Fire Mitchell Baker. Her blog post the day Brendan left was obviously an > attempt to get good PR. It now looks foolish and stands in contrast to what > the FAQ says. > 3) Adopt openness. Not merely in words, but in action. Allowing someone to be > pressured into leaving for participating legally and privately in the > democratic process on an issue that's already been won by the opposition in > the courts is revenge, plain and simple. It's no way to influence people and > win friends. > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
