On 4/13/14, 5:00 PM, jsabash wrote: > On 4/13/2014 12:38 PM, Michael Connor wrote: >> I’d have been surprised if no one on the board raised the possibility >> at that point. In a crisis, it’s important to put all of the options >> on the table and understand the tradeoffs. As unpalatable as the idea >> would have seemed to many at the time, in hindsight it may have been >> better for both Brendan and Mozilla to prevent the situation from >> escalating as it did. > That might have been justified as "Plan B" If the organization was in > ruins, > It seems that wasn't the case. > > Plan A being: > Stand up for what is right > Don't second guess your decisions based on minority pressures > Consider the ideals and aspirations of the Corp you are paid to > protect, and not just the business consequences. > >
Evidently it wasn't Plan A, given the amount of time that passed between it being brought up for the first time and when it actually happened. Jorge _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
