On 29/08/14 16:54, Majken Connor wrote: > Your train of thought seems dangerously similar to "if you've got nothing > to hide then you've got nothing to be worried about" which is definitely > NOT Mozilla's policy on privacy and so I think is irrelevant here.
That's not my train of thought at all. I am merely trying to get people to climb down from the "but, but, but... the NSA! And National Security Letters!" perch and do some realistic risk analysis. >From other posts in this thread, it seems to me that we need a bit more detail about how the tiles reporting service operates and what data it retains before we can do such analysis. For example, it only just came out that we aren't storing individual IP-linked records long-term. That makes a big difference, because it means that it's not going to be possible for someone to send us a subpoena which says "Tell us every tile users from IP 12.34.56.78 clicked on in the past 6 months". I seem to remember that normally features have a privacy analysis as part of their development. Anyone know where the analysis is for Tiles? That may well have most of this data. Then, we can judge whether the proposed text for the privacy policy is fairly explaining the risks and issues. Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
