On 16/12/14 16:34, Mike Hoye wrote: > I think that the case the Reps make - broadly speaking that enabling > community leadership is a thing we want and that a mozilla.org email > address can lend weight and legitimacy to those efforts - is compelling. > I think a better question than "should the Reps have m.o addresses" is > "do the Reps have an effective governance model".
I think they do; that's not a question for me. In one sense, Reps is the easy part. > - Reps Council be empowered to nominate people to have an appropriate > Mozilla.org email addresses. Does that scale? (I think Majken basically asked this question too.) > - With the module peers' assent those addresses be granted for the > duration of that person's active participation in the Reps, and that An ephemeral email address is far less useful. I'm sure people step down from being reps for reasons other than no longer being involved with Mozilla. If we have the ability to remove in case of abuse, > - Council and module peers be responsible for usage guidelines, > policing, etc, with final approval resting with the module owner. Thing is, this makes it seem like @mozilla.org email addresses will remain a reps-only thing. Is that what you are saying? How do we expand past reps? Not every core volunteer Mozillian can be or wants to be a rep. Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
