No, the idea is to figure out email addresses for communities and use Reps as the pilot group to figure out how to do this since Reps have already been vetted.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:21 PM, fantasai <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/14/2015 11:03 AM, Mike Connor wrote: > >> I'll note that, historically, we haven't created a new @mozilla.org >> address >> since 2005 or so. Mitchell had very strong feelings on the subject at the >> time, and we simply dropped the practice. I don't think we can or should >> move forward without her approval. >> >> On a personal level, I'd be okay with something like @reps.mozilla.org if >> we want to confer some form of official status on Reps, but the historical >> weight of @mozilla.org addresses seems like something we should grant >> with >> appropriate care and caution. >> > > It seems to me that mozillians.org solves the problem of "give a badge > freely to everyone interested to wear it". > > If the problem we're trying to solve is Reps needing a formal email > address, then @reps.mozilla.org seems like it would solve that very > neatly without getting tangled in other things. It also seems like > being a Rep is something that's binary: you either are or you're not, > so it would be easy to administer. > > Having read the whole thread, it seems both problems that wanted to > be solved are easily solved as above, and anding out @mozilla.org > addresses is a very complex solution in search of a problem. We > can safely defer discussing it until someone finds that problem. > > ~fantasai > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
