Sorry, for community members, not communities! On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Majken Connor <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, the idea is to figure out email addresses for communities and use Reps > as the pilot group to figure out how to do this since Reps have already > been vetted. > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:21 PM, fantasai <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 01/14/2015 11:03 AM, Mike Connor wrote: >> >>> I'll note that, historically, we haven't created a new @mozilla.org >>> address >>> since 2005 or so. Mitchell had very strong feelings on the subject at >>> the >>> time, and we simply dropped the practice. I don't think we can or should >>> move forward without her approval. >>> >>> On a personal level, I'd be okay with something like @reps.mozilla.org >>> if >>> we want to confer some form of official status on Reps, but the >>> historical >>> weight of @mozilla.org addresses seems like something we should grant >>> with >>> appropriate care and caution. >>> >> >> It seems to me that mozillians.org solves the problem of "give a badge >> freely to everyone interested to wear it". >> >> If the problem we're trying to solve is Reps needing a formal email >> address, then @reps.mozilla.org seems like it would solve that very >> neatly without getting tangled in other things. It also seems like >> being a Rep is something that's binary: you either are or you're not, >> so it would be easy to administer. >> >> Having read the whole thread, it seems both problems that wanted to >> be solved are easily solved as above, and anding out @mozilla.org >> addresses is a very complex solution in search of a problem. We >> can safely defer discussing it until someone finds that problem. >> >> ~fantasai >> >> _______________________________________________ >> governance mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance >> > > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
