On 01/14/2015 11:03 AM, Mike Connor wrote:
I'll note that, historically, we haven't created a new @mozilla.org address
since 2005 or so. Mitchell had very strong feelings on the subject at the
time, and we simply dropped the practice. I don't think we can or should
move forward without her approval.
On a personal level, I'd be okay with something like @reps.mozilla.org if
we want to confer some form of official status on Reps, but the historical
weight of @mozilla.org addresses seems like something we should grant with
appropriate care and caution.
It seems to me that mozillians.org solves the problem of "give a badge
freely to everyone interested to wear it".
If the problem we're trying to solve is Reps needing a formal email
address, then @reps.mozilla.org seems like it would solve that very
neatly without getting tangled in other things. It also seems like
being a Rep is something that's binary: you either are or you're not,
so it would be easy to administer.
Having read the whole thread, it seems both problems that wanted to
be solved are easily solved as above, and anding out @mozilla.org
addresses is a very complex solution in search of a problem. We
can safely defer discussing it until someone finds that problem.
~fantasai
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
