I should perhaps clarify, though, that I don't really think there's a need for a project-wide policy to enforce that channels must be logged, and that's probably what Yvan is reacting strongly to. Most of the important public IRC channels are already being publicly logged, as mentioned, and where they aren't it's easy enough to reach out to the channel owner and change that.
Gavin On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Gavin Sharp <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Yvan Boily <[email protected]> wrote: >> While I agree that there might be value, I don't think that value would be >> worth the negative feedback from the change in perception that this logging >> would trigger. > > I disagree. I think the benefits are real, and that you're vastly > overstating these costs, or the potential for "negative feedback". > Many channels are already logged publicly, and the cost vs. benefits > for those changes have been net positive. > > Gavin _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
