FWIW I think your proposal is more practical than a free form field.

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Mike Connor <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, I'm a little lost on how this concept solves the original problem
> here.  A free-form field means these users could continue to identify as a
> part of Albania.  Isn't that more divisive and controversial than allowing
> Kosovo into the list?  I assume it's long-settled that we won't use ISO's
> short name for Taiwan?
>
> The only advantage I see is that we can point things elsewhere, potentially
> at the expense of effectiveness (see comments about the problems with the
> old free form entry).
>
> -- Mike
>
> On 25 May 2015 at 16:31, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > On 5/25/15 11:43 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Mike Connor <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> The origin of this thread was from a legacy entry that mis-identified
>> >>> Kosovo as a part of Albania.  I don't think that passes any reasonable
>> >>> sniff test.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> And yet people clearly want to not change it.
>> >>
>> >
>> > That's because the only other remotely sensible choice we gave them is to
>> > change to identifying Kosovo as a part of Serbia.  If we gave them the
>> > option of identifying Kosovo as part of neither, and _then_ they
>> continued
>> > to identify as part of Albania, then we could have a discussion about how
>> > to handle that.  But that's not the situation we're in right now.  Given
>> > the situation we _are_ in, I can totally understand the reluctance to
>> > change.  All this has been mentioned in this thread before, so bringing
>> up
>> > the "but they don't want to change" thing in this context is odd.
>> >
>>
>> Sorry, it was like 50 messages back and I missed it when I skimmed to catch
>> up with the thread. With that said, I don't think it's at all hard to
>> anticipate that we will run into hard cases.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Anyway, it seems to me like we have a proposal on the table (Ehsan's)
>> that
>> > you're happy with.  For the record, I'm happy with it too.
>>
>>
>> Yes, I can live with it.
>>
>> -Ekr
>> _______________________________________________
>> governance mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>>
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to