On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/25/15 11:43 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Mike Connor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The origin of this thread was from a legacy entry that mis-identified >>> Kosovo as a part of Albania. I don't think that passes any reasonable >>> sniff test. >>> >> >> And yet people clearly want to not change it. >> > > That's because the only other remotely sensible choice we gave them is to > change to identifying Kosovo as a part of Serbia. If we gave them the > option of identifying Kosovo as part of neither, and _then_ they continued > to identify as part of Albania, then we could have a discussion about how > to handle that. But that's not the situation we're in right now. Given > the situation we _are_ in, I can totally understand the reluctance to > change. All this has been mentioned in this thread before, so bringing up > the "but they don't want to change" thing in this context is odd. > Sorry, it was like 50 messages back and I missed it when I skimmed to catch up with the thread. With that said, I don't think it's at all hard to anticipate that we will run into hard cases. > Anyway, it seems to me like we have a proposal on the table (Ehsan's) that > you're happy with. For the record, I'm happy with it too. Yes, I can live with it. -Ekr _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
