SGTM. --Jet
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Mitchell Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/21/15 2:17 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> When a Module Owner is also a Mozilla employee who then leaves Mozilla, >>>> it >>>> seems prudent that their Module Ownership is relinquished. >>>> >>> I would be very uneasy with this being the default. Module Ownership is >>> a Mozilla project position, and does not come with or go with employment >>> by any particular entity, MoCo/MoFo included. This is one of the key >>> distinctions which makes the Module Ownership system different from the >>> MoCo org chart. >>> >> Absolutely agree with Gerv here. >> >> That said, I think it would be worth being better at asking departing >> employees if they want to retain module ownership/peership. >> >> I think quite often people leaving mozilla end up not staying involved >> enough that it makes sense for them to remain owners/peers. So >> changing jobs is a good time to ask what their plans are. >> >> But, I definitely think that the default should be that people retain >> their module position. >> >> / Jonas >> > > I'll make another pitch for my proposal that we have a firm requirement > for a discussion when employee owners leave mozilla, and a follow up at a > set time after that. > > ml > > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
