This is a great plan IMO (with discussion whenever someone leaves mozilla). Thanks Mitchell and bsmedberg for pushing for this!
- jst On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Jet Villegas <[email protected]> wrote: > SGTM. > > --Jet > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Mitchell Baker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 10/21/15 2:17 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> When a Module Owner is also a Mozilla employee who then leaves Mozilla, >>>>> it >>>>> seems prudent that their Module Ownership is relinquished. >>>>> >>>> I would be very uneasy with this being the default. Module Ownership is >>>> a Mozilla project position, and does not come with or go with employment >>>> by any particular entity, MoCo/MoFo included. This is one of the key >>>> distinctions which makes the Module Ownership system different from the >>>> MoCo org chart. >>>> >>> Absolutely agree with Gerv here. >>> >>> That said, I think it would be worth being better at asking departing >>> employees if they want to retain module ownership/peership. >>> >>> I think quite often people leaving mozilla end up not staying involved >>> enough that it makes sense for them to remain owners/peers. So >>> changing jobs is a good time to ask what their plans are. >>> >>> But, I definitely think that the default should be that people retain >>> their module position. >>> >>> / Jonas >>> >> >> I'll make another pitch for my proposal that we have a firm requirement >> for a discussion when employee owners leave mozilla, and a follow up at a >> set time after that. >> >> ml >> >> > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
