I don't think looking at 90 days is fair. Let's look at 7 days, at least there's something manageable
https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/?q=pocket&date_start=2015-12-10&selected=7d

9 'pocket' feedback entries, out of 3893 results (I'm counting only 'Firefox', that's about 39% of the entire 7 days feedback).

1 is completely unrelated (donations), 1 is a 'full-spectrum-rant'. It leaves us with 7, and only 4 of them are actually complaining about Pocket's integration.

4 out of almost 4k people who took the time to use input to give feedback (and we all know that people rarely take the time to give positive comments). Would you define this as 'overwhelmingly negative'? I don't.

I also expect people to bring up Pocket every time they complain about the removal of a feature: "hey, you're removing awesome feature X but you ship **** like Pocket in the browser?".

And just to be clear: I don't use Pocket, I didn't even know it existed before 38.0.5, and I'm really unhappy on how the integration was done from a technical point of view (note: you can still disable it from about:config, if you know what you're doing). I just learned to deal with the fact that my point of view is not that of the majority of Firefox users.

Francesco

P.S. the Chinese feedback you reported seems to complain about the fact that he can't use Pocket anymore from China




_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to