Il 18/12/15 09:04, Angly Cat ha scritto:
This is not how statistics works. To get a representative statistical
sampling, you should be widening time range, not narrowing it. Pocket
was shipped with Firefox 38.0.5 at 2nd of June, more than 6 month ago.
So basically we should look at all feedbacks within this time (minus
month or two in order to filter 0-day rage feedbacks).
Not trying to provide a statistically relevant analysis on 9 entries.
And, thanks, pretty aware of my limits every day, you don't need to be
worried or sorry :-)
If you have time and resources to do such an analysis, excluding false
positives and extrapolating tendency over time, please do, I would be
really interested in the results. I only picked en-US, that's 56140
entries:
https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/?q=&date_end=2015-12-18&date_start=2015-06-04&locale=en-US&product=Firefox
m sorry, but you're really not good in statistics. Regarding this matter we
don't and shouldn't care about feedbacks that are not about Pocket. E.g. if
there would be a hundred negative feedbacks about Pocket and a billion positive
feedbacks about anything but Pocket - that's 'overwhelmingly negative' Pocket
feedback.
That assumes you're interested in feedback about Pocket, I'm not. I'm
more interested in knowing how many people complain about Firefox, and
do it because of Pocket.
Francesco
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
