Hi, I would like to bring the following review decision to the attention of the community and to ask how such matters can be escalated: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060
It is not just the decision that I dispute, I am not happy with the process leading to this decision, and development has been ongoing for around two years now and I first started contributing to the general area of the work (asm.js at that time year before that). I dispute that Mozilla Corp can demonstrate the merit of the decision. I have raised the problems with the CEO Chris on two occasions, and recently with the module owner without response. I believe there is merit in the objections, and that I can demonstrate better performance and a better plan. Where does that leave the Mozilla community and governance based on merit? Do I just give up and not bother? My impression of working on this project is that Mozilla Corp dictated the decisions, and one reason given was that the critical issue was getting agreement between the web browsers but this would seem to assume that the Firefox community has no representation for the product. I was not consulted before the creation of the WebAssembly CG, the group many never have been given a choice on how the Chairs were appointed, and in the end I am just ignored. I could demonstrate better performance at the start of the process and better performance now, and can articulate a development plan. Regards Douglas Crosher _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
