On 2017-02-28 6:35 PM, Douglas Crosher via governance wrote:
Hi,
The community might like to know that Mozilla has claimed authority to
publish a WebAssembly MVP and appears to have done so, and the claim is
signed by a Mozilla module peer.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webassembly/2017Feb/0002.html
That post is _co-signed_ by engineers from Mozilla, Google, Apple and
Microsoft, and makes the specific claim that there is consensus among
browser implementers from Mozilla, Google, Apple and Microsoft that the
design of the MVP is complete.
This is a statement of fact, not a policy decision imposed by fiat. You
say "they have been asked" to surrender the Chair and hold elections,
but you should specify that _you_ were the person doing the asking, per
here:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/934
... and I note that the Administrator for W3C Community Groups did not
"appear to support" your position, but bluntly refuted it. While you may
disagree with the outcome of this process, these flagrant
mischaracterizations of public discussions will not convince anyone of
your position or change that outcome in the slightest.
You're welcome to email me directly if you'd like to discuss this
further, but I'm confident Governance is not the right place to continue
this.
Thank you,
- mhoye
--
Mike Hoye
Engineering Community Manager.
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
