Hi Benjamin, Thank you for the clarification, perhaps I was mislead by the 'outdated' wiki, and on how this 'community' works or doesn't. If I have done all I can here then so be it.
Regards Douglas Crosher On 02/24/2017 09:49 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > That module wiki is outdated Brendan is not involved in the project. I'm > not shutting down this discussion I'm just letting you know you have > exhausted your options. > > I've been around long enough to see many emails like yours and see them > go nowhere. > > If you haven't got a positive response from the module owner or Chris I > don't think anyone is going to intervene on your behalf. > > > > > On Feb 23, 2017 2:42 PM, "Douglas Crosher" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Benjamin, > > With all due respect I believe Brendan was still listed as having the > final say on technical disputes, and there are likely other paths too. I > see nothing to indicate that you have the authority to close down this > discussion. If no one in Mozilla wishes to engage then that is their > choice, I just won't bother here any more. > > Regards > Douglas Crosher > > On 02/24/2017 09:33 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > > That's not how things work and no Brendan hasnt been involved in the > > project for years. > > > > Mozilla's Board of Directors don't get involved in bugs and I can tell > > you that your not going to get any escalation by emailing here. > > > > Module owner has the final say and you've indicated you already went > > that route so you exhausted all your options. > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 23, 2017 2:30 PM, "Douglas Crosher" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > Hi Benjamin, > > > > Last time I looked I believe Brendan still had the final say, > so I find > > that hard to believe. I would like to hear that from the Mozilla > > Directors? > > > > I would like to see some accommodation for the performance use > cases, > > and it does not seem a big thing to ask and something that > would benefit > > the web. This might require some new split in responsibilities > so that > > everyone can get along, and some more objective agreed metrics for > > 'merit'. > > > > Regards > > Douglas Crosher > > > > On 02/24/2017 08:41 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > > > There is no escalation if the module owner and decision > makers in the > > > bug have made a decision. > > > > > > It appears you've exhausted your options. > > > > > > On Feb 23, 2017 1:23 PM, "Douglas Crosher via governance" > > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to bring the following review decision to the > > attention of > > > the community and to ask how such matters can be escalated: > > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060 > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060> > > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060 > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060>> > > > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060 > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060> > > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060 > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060>>> > > > > > > It is not just the decision that I dispute, I am not happy > > with the > > > process leading to this decision, and development has been > > ongoing for > > > around two years now and I first started contributing to the > > general > > > area of the work (asm.js at that time year before that). > > > > > > I dispute that Mozilla Corp can demonstrate the merit of the > > decision. I > > > have raised the problems with the CEO Chris on two > occasions, and > > > recently with the module owner without response. I believe > > there is > > > merit in the objections, and that I can demonstrate better > > performance > > > and a better plan. Where does that leave the Mozilla > community and > > > governance based on merit? Do I just give up and not bother? > > > > > > My impression of working on this project is that Mozilla > Corp > > dictated > > > the decisions, and one reason given was that the critical > > issue was > > > getting agreement between the web browsers but this > would seem > > to assume > > > that the Firefox community has no representation for the > product. > > > > > > I was not consulted before the creation of the > WebAssembly CG, > > the group > > > many never have been given a choice on how the Chairs were > > appointed, > > > and in the end I am just ignored. > > > > > > I could demonstrate better performance at the start of the > > process and > > > better performance now, and can articulate a development > plan. > > > > > > Regards > > > Douglas Crosher > > > _______________________________________________ > > > governance mailing list > > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance> > > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance>> > > > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance> > > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance>>> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
