Hi Benjamin, With all due respect I believe Brendan was still listed as having the final say on technical disputes, and there are likely other paths too. I see nothing to indicate that you have the authority to close down this discussion. If no one in Mozilla wishes to engage then that is their choice, I just won't bother here any more.
Regards Douglas Crosher On 02/24/2017 09:33 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > That's not how things work and no Brendan hasnt been involved in the > project for years. > > Mozilla's Board of Directors don't get involved in bugs and I can tell > you that your not going to get any escalation by emailing here. > > Module owner has the final say and you've indicated you already went > that route so you exhausted all your options. > > > > > On Feb 23, 2017 2:30 PM, "Douglas Crosher" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Benjamin, > > Last time I looked I believe Brendan still had the final say, so I find > that hard to believe. I would like to hear that from the Mozilla > Directors? > > I would like to see some accommodation for the performance use cases, > and it does not seem a big thing to ask and something that would benefit > the web. This might require some new split in responsibilities so that > everyone can get along, and some more objective agreed metrics for > 'merit'. > > Regards > Douglas Crosher > > On 02/24/2017 08:41 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > > There is no escalation if the module owner and decision makers in the > > bug have made a decision. > > > > It appears you've exhausted your options. > > > > On Feb 23, 2017 1:23 PM, "Douglas Crosher via governance" > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to bring the following review decision to the > attention of > > the community and to ask how such matters can be escalated: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060 > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060> > > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060 > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060>> > > > > It is not just the decision that I dispute, I am not happy > with the > > process leading to this decision, and development has been > ongoing for > > around two years now and I first started contributing to the > general > > area of the work (asm.js at that time year before that). > > > > I dispute that Mozilla Corp can demonstrate the merit of the > decision. I > > have raised the problems with the CEO Chris on two occasions, and > > recently with the module owner without response. I believe > there is > > merit in the objections, and that I can demonstrate better > performance > > and a better plan. Where does that leave the Mozilla community and > > governance based on merit? Do I just give up and not bother? > > > > My impression of working on this project is that Mozilla Corp > dictated > > the decisions, and one reason given was that the critical > issue was > > getting agreement between the web browsers but this would seem > to assume > > that the Firefox community has no representation for the product. > > > > I was not consulted before the creation of the WebAssembly CG, > the group > > many never have been given a choice on how the Chairs were > appointed, > > and in the end I am just ignored. > > > > I could demonstrate better performance at the start of the > process and > > better performance now, and can articulate a development plan. > > > > Regards > > Douglas Crosher > > _______________________________________________ > > governance mailing list > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance> > > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance>> > > > > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
