I think the answer is yes, they are moved to the diabetic record etc -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Duszynski Sent: Monday, 23 January 2006 3:52 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Digital signage with Terminal services
Greg Twyford wrote: > Hugh Nelson wrote: > >> I would be really happy if somebody in Canberra would just decree that >> there is one standard way to put "Pap Smear" on a pathology request >> and report - so the medical software could trigger actions automatically. > > > Hugh, > > MD can already tell you when the last pap smear was, based on pathology > report dates. You can enter the term your provider uses in its reports > for a pap smear. > > Most path providers will now provide your results in HL7 and MD will put > atomic data on a range of diabetes related tests, such as HbA1C, > triglyceride, cholesterol, and a number of others, into the measures > table and hence the diabetes record and progress notes. > > If GPs start requesting HL7 results from their pathology providers and > annoying their medical software vendors the list will grow. > > Greg Regarding the placement of atomised pathology data from a path provider into MD, I understand that these items will appear as a record in pathatom.dbf and pathol.dbf database tables. But will they appear directly in the diabetes record of that patient i.e. populate directly either the measures.dbf table or the diabetes.dbf table ? I'm recalling that atomised pathology data only exists within the associated pathology tables of MD. Has this changed whereby MD has some intelligence to autopopulate other tables ? Andre. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
